The comprehensive city guide
    Hoboken     Jersey City     Edgewater     Weehawken     Classifieds     Calendar     Chat     Contact    
 Message Board
Kannekt Forum Index
   Crystal Point Condos
  Question about tax abatement

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users

Post Reply New Topic

 
4

Poster Thread
Re: Question about tax abatement
#31
Anonymous
how many more units need to sell before developer exits the board?
Posted on: 2012/1/20 9:23
Re: Question about tax abatement
#32
Anonymous
46 units left to sell.
Posted on: 2012/1/21 11:30
Re: Question about tax abatement
#33
Anonymous
Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
how many more units need to sell before developer exits the board?


The developer has one only seat left out of the 5 total seat on the board. The developer has already lost the control of the board.
Posted on: 2012/1/21 15:29
Re: Question about tax abatement
#34
Anonymous
Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
how many more units need to sell before developer exits the board?


The developer has one only seat left out of the 5 total seat on the board. The developer has already lost the control of the board.


Yes, but the developer will have that seat and certain rights until all units are sold.
Posted on: 2012/1/23 13:54
Re: Question about tax abatement
#35
Anonymous
does anyone know what the current jersey city tax rate is? (what percentage should i be using to multiply my purchase price to get to taxes per year?)




The actual Real estate taxes generally turn out to be about $2.00 per $100 of sale price. Though the formula is based not based on sale price actual taxes appear to be 2% of sale price.


46 units left to sell.

As of June 15th looks like 4 1bed units and 2 pent house units left to sell by builder
Posted on: 2012/6/15 18:13
Re: Question about tax abatement
#36
Anonymous
> As of June 15th looks like 4 1bed units and 2 pent house units left to sell by builder

Last I heard they were sold out, the sales office is gone...
Posted on: 2012/6/18 9:02
Re: Question about tax abatement
#37
Anonymous
Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
In general, does the tax abatement period start when one purchases a unit or when the building was first sold? If it was based on the time when the building was first sold, does it mean that there are only 28.5 years left if we assume the building was first sold 1.5 year ago?


The tax abatement directive is not a city driven one it is a state driven one. This is uniform through out the state. The relevant code is NJSA 40A-20 and other related directives which have become law.

The tax abatement period can be up to 30 years and begins on the substantial completion of the project. Generally the builder completes few floors at a time and occupancy is staggered. The township does not deem a unit as complete in terms of construction until an occupancy certificate is obtained. This certificate is obtained on the day of closing. So the tax abatement period begins when the first occupant moves in.

Sorry for the long narrative, but the only way to explain this is define the logic behind it and what laws guide the abatement schedule.
Posted on: 2013/1/22 8:44
Re: Question about tax abatement
#38
Anonymous
# 11 says
Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
30-YR Abatement starts after the first closing in the building. So if you purchase today, you have 28 years left.

The RE taxes are based off the first owner's buying price. But, you always have the option to opt out of the POLIT program.


# 11 your second statement is partially not right. It is based on the latest true arms length sale. It is governed by a state law NJSA 40A:20-3(b). However, if the recent sale price results in a lower tax than the existing tax. The existing tax stays put. But as you say one can opt out of the PILOT.

Taking into consideration that the property taxes in Jersey City are 7.1837% of the assessed value it may not work out for many. The assessment in Jersey City tends to be 20-22% of resent sale price.
Posted on: 2013/1/22 8:57
Re: Question about tax abatement
#39
Anonymous
#11 wrote

Quote:

Anonymous wrote:
CP Tax Abatement: 1.1% 1-5yrs, 1.3% 6-10yrs, 1.41% 11-30yrs


#11 This is a bit more complicated than the simple formula above.

The Pilot has three tax components - a) the city component which is a negotiated item between the city and builder , b) the county component which is fixed by the county for all such programs at 5% of the city component and c) a 2% administrative charge levied by the city.

The city component is based on the annual gross revenue of a unit. Annual gross revenue is mortgage plus interest plus maintenance. The mortgage and interest is calculated on the selling price of the property and not on the actual mortgage. The selling price is the latest selling price. So on a resale the current selling price prevails and not what the original owner paid. The mortgage rate is the current mortgage rate.

The city component is 10% of gross revenue for years 1-5, 12% years 6-10 and 16% for years 11-30. However, if this results in a lower PILOT at a future sale the highest PILOT amount that existed prior to this sale prevails.

Now with lower mortgage rates even higher prices in some cases result in lower PILOT amount. But the city will not reduce it.

Here is an example: Current PILOT $ 8, 600 per year.

Recent sale $ 1,300,000
Current mortgage rate 3.75%
Current maintenance = $ 800 per month
Mortgage=$ 6,020 per month (city calculates on the selling price not actual mortgage)

Annual Gross revenue is (800+6020)*12=$ 81,840
City PILOT component= 10% of $ 81,840= $ 8, 140
County PILOT component= 5% of $ 8,140= $ 409.20
Administrative component= 2% of $ 8,140= $ 162.80

Total PILOT = $ 8,712.00 annually. Since this is higher than the current PILOT of $ 8, 600 this becomes the new PILOT.
Some members of credit unions can obtain mortgages at 3.25% and their new PILOT $ 8,290, but they would still have to pay $ 8, 600.
Posted on: 2013/1/22 9:11
Re: Question about tax abatement
#40
Anonymous
"The city component is 10% of gross revenue for years 1-5, 12% for years 6-10 and 16% for years 11-30. However, if this results in a lower PILOT at a future sale the highest PILOT amount that existed prior to this sale prevails."

The percentages in the statement above that I have made in # 39 above may have been further reduced on a subsequent appeal.
Posted on: 2013/1/23 8:19
4


Post Reply New Topic


All Forums
Who's Online
4 user(s) are online (4 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 4

more...
Search
Login
Username:

Password:



Kannekt